Print Friendly
From Ideas to Implementation: Creating Sustainable Cities with Good Governance
Biking in a Favela in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

How cities are governed has a significant impact on whether low-income communities, like Rio de Janeiro’s favelas, genuinely benefit from infrastructure projects. Photo by Mariana Gil/EMBARQ Brasil.

How do we make cities work for people? As a WRI Helms Fellow on Urban Governance and Sustainable Cities, Maria Antonia Tigre was tasked with answering this question. Through From ideas to implementation: creating sustainable cities with good governance here on TheCityFix, Maria will draw on her field research in two Brazilian cities—Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo—to explore the key governance gaps in urban planning, law, public policy, and institutions. Each part of the series will examine how reforms to urban governance can ensure that city-level decision making is transparent, inclusive, and accountable.


Over the last 20 years, three major urban projects in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas—slum neighborhoods—have failed to succeed in the long run, despite initially drawing international acclaim. These projects—Favela Bairro, Projeto de Aceleração de Crescimento (PAC), and Morar Carioca—were all intended to revitalize favelas throughout the city. For example, Favela Bairro, developed by renowned architect and urban designer Jorge Jauregui, was the first of the three, and brought vital infrastructure to the favelas—including basic upgrades such as paved alleyways and sewage lines. Although this gave the favelas basic neighborhood upgrades, residents were not taught how to use it, and after 20 years of misuse, much of the original infrastructure is gone.

The project failed in the long term due to one single governance problem: monitoring. As Jorge Jauregui explained during my field research in Brazil, local governments often develop infrastructure in favelas without preparing the community to operate and use it as intended. For example, many community buildings are no longer used for their original purpose and constant maintenance is required. Not yet comfortable with their new surroundings, community members do not understand how to maintain the infrastructure they receive, given the lack of guidance. The government’s absence can also lead to the rise of drug dealers, who fill the gap by actually providing urban services and maintaining order. As a result, projects and programs end up failing to provide the intended benefits, and the investment is lost.

This is why governance matters. Favela Bairro could have been a successful program in the long run. PAC and Morar Carioca—follow-up projects created years later—would not have been necessary except for simple expansions to additional communities. However, the model lacked good governance, as there was no participation from the public, residents did not have access to the information they needed, and the local government failed to monitor for results after implementation. Cities can’t develop into sustainable communities without the support of good governance.

How to Think about Governance

There are five key factors for making cities work: access to information, public participation, institutional capacity, accountability, and resilience. These categories encompass a range of issues related to urban governance, such as how well urban land markets function, how transparent government agencies are, and how much civil society participates in local governance.

Urban Governance Chart by Maria Tigre

A framework for thinking about urban governance. Graphic by Maria Tigre.

Many cities struggle to achieve their commitments to sustainability. However, reforming the ways that our cities are governed can provide an easier path to get them to work. By laying the right foundation and preparing all stakeholders involved to do their part, we can create resilient, sustainable cities that are better prepared to be successful in the long run, instead of only efficient models for the present. The idea is to lay the proper foundation for creating cities as strong as the buildings that make them up.

For the following weeks, I will explain each category, the paths that we can use to reach them, and the cross-cutting axes that support them. It is important to note that although this framework indicates possible answers, it is not an exhaustive list. There are many ways to achieve good urban governance, and this is only a  starting point for thinking about how we can make sustainable cities a reality worldwide.

For the next installment of From Ideas to Implementation on why access to information matters for good urban governance, click here.

Print Friendly
  • JTT

    I like the author’s call for good governance, sustained public support of infrastructure projects, and public participation.
    I agree that the projects would benefit from better governance. Zero maintenance of the interventions is a huge problem. From the perspective of urban planning, this may be explained how/where the programs are created. SMH was separated to deal with, almost exclusively, the favelas. Within the government, people make jokes calling it the Secretaria de Probres, and there has been historically poor coordination between them and the other state organs that should take responsibility for maintenance of the projects. There is currently a debate within urban planners about whether or not have favela-specific programs is good practice, or if “favela knowledge” should be integrated into all state organs.
    I have a couple points of concern. The first may seem rather trivial, but Jorge Jauregui, renowned he may be, did not design the “favela bairro” program. Jorge was one of the well-known architects who designed a couple of the interventions. But as I understand, it was Luiz Paulo Conde, then secretary of municipal housing (SMH), who crafted the policy adopted by the mayor and received technical and financial assistance from the IDB. Also, PAC and Morar Carioca were rarely rolled out in areas that received favela-bairro investments, and when they were, it wasn’t to patch up infrastructure, it was to complete urbanization and add new infrastructure. The idea that they wouldn’t be necessary if only Rio had good governance, is in my opinion far fetched. While Morar Carioca should be viewed as the revamped favela-bairro (the methodology completely changed, at least on paper if not in practice), PAC is a project of a different nature. For one its federal, so the municipal government (which ran Favela-Bairro and Morar Carioca) had very little to do with it. Jorge was one of the architects, but he holds no public office and he was not involved in any of the Morar Carioca interventions. PAC is a major infrastructure project, with budgets that amount to 10-20x that of favela bairro and morar carioca.

    I also want to draw attention to the idea that favela residents need to be taught how to use basic infrastructure such as paved roads. The idea that the infrastructure failed because the poor favelados don’t know how to maintain or use it is a very common misconception of the Brazilian middle and upper classes. As if residents of Copacabana received early education about the proper way to use a road or basic sanitation infrastructure. It’s borderline offense, and there is no empirical evidence that favela residents somehow mistreat public investments any more than non-favela residents treat public infrastructure in the “formal city”. Somehow this is an idea that has permeated common discourse. But I question whether or not it holds up to scrutiny. If the government builds a community center, but then never returns to maintain it, and as a result it gets graffitied and the doors fall off etc… it isn’t because the residents weren’t “trained” on the proper use of buildings.

  • Pingback: From Ideas to Implementation: 4 Strategies for Driving Change in Governance | TheCityFix()

  • Pingback: From Ideas to Implementation: 3 Steps for Improving Urban Resilience | TheCityFix()

  • Pingback: From Ideas to Implementation: 3 Ideas for Creating More Accountable City Governments | TheCityFix()

  • Pingback: From Ideas to Implementation: How to Improve Capacity for Better Public Leaders | TheCityFix()

  • Pingback: From Ideas to Implementation: How to Foster Effective Public Participation | TheCityFix()

  • Pingback: From Ideas to Implementation: 3 Ways to Ensure that Citizens Have Access to Information | TheCityFix()

  • Germano Johansson

    Great article. I look forward for the next ones.

  • Pingback: From Ideas to Implementation: Creating Sustaina...()