Print Friendly
No Room for Bicyclists in Small Wisconsin Town

What is the fairest way of allocating road space? Photo by Li'l Wolf.

A small town in Wisconsin has been getting quite a bit of attention for considering a ban on bicyclists and pedestrian traffic from certain roads. A public safety committee in Hull, Wis., a town with a population of only about 6,000 people, drafted an ordinance that would require groups of bikers, runners and walkers to register travel plans with the town prior to traveling.

Hull’s example may not be totally relevant to the transport struggles of larger cities, where the interweaving of multiple road users is ever more present. However, this case can perhaps start a dialogue about the relationship of road users to one another and to public space.

The town attributes the reason behind its proposed law to complaints from private vehicle drivers, as well as to safety concerns for vulnerable road users. However misguided, it seems that the effort to pass the ordinance is coming from a good place. You can read the Public Safety Task Force Minutes from the September 15 meeting here to understand how the discussion led to the proposed law.

Town officials are well aware of the growing role of pedestrians and bicyclists in Hull. At one point, Chairman John Holdridge even says, “I think the key thing here is more and more pedestrians and bikers are using our roads so it’s a shared situation.  Sometimes that’s a tough sell to drivers.”

Besides being potentially illegal, the proposed law wouldn’t address any public safety concerns, explains Cyclelicious. “Drivers in this city of 5,000 seem to be annoyed by the momentary delays posed by walkers, joggers, and cyclists. There are no sidewalks on the 80 miles of road in Hull and, according to Public Safety Committee meeting notes, the lanes within town limits are no more than 12 feet wide.”

Plus, Grist argues, there have not been any crashes involving a bike or a pedestrian since 2008.

The case in Hull is not unique. Similar small towns have dealt with protecting and allocating safe space to all road users. For example, the city of Denton in Texas passed an ordinance requiring cars to leave a 3-foot passing distance for cyclists. Read our coverage of this ordinance here.

What’s your opinion on Hull’s proposal? How does your city deal with multiple road users? What would you do differently?

Print Friendly
  • Littletinyfish

    The problem with restricting bicycles and pedestrians is that you are punishing the people who need protection. That’s like saying everyone can’t go outside because a murderer could kill you, instead of just dealing with the murderer. Kids should not be allowed on playgrounds because pedophiles hang out there. It’s difficult for motorists to hear that it is THEY who are actually causing the problems.

  • Guest

    Banning bicyclists and pedestrians is never an acceptable way to solve conflicts they may have with drivers in any context. However it’s perhaps worth noting that Hull is not a city nor a “smal town” in the way the author here seems to be taking it. It’s a township, which in Wisconsin, means it’s the rural administration of a large area. Just look up the town on Google satellite – it’s absolutely nothing but forest and fields and rural roads. So we’re not really dealing with urban transport or public space issues – it sounds like we’re dealing with a local university cross-country running team and some cycling teams that have been taking up a lane to run/bike and some local people got grumpy and made a terrible proposal on how to solve it.What Hull is proposing is bad enough as it is, but CityFix makes it sound like a city/town  of 6,000 “with 80 miles of [county] roads” is banning anyone not in a car and that’s not quite the reality. A township in Wisconsin is a relatively arge rural area.  I’d caution CityFix in releasing the self-righteous bike-rights wolves (I am admittedly most often one of them) on this township as the reaction to it there will probably only make things worse for local walkers and cyclists. //c